Peterson, Michael
CLAIMING PURPLE HEART(S) - June 2004 -- FROM COURT TV WEBSITE -
When business
executive Kathleen Peterson was found dead at the bottom of a staircase,
investigators figured she fell after a night of drinking. But when
pathologists concluded Peterson's injuries looked more like a beating,
prosecutors pointed the finger at her husband, novelist Michael
Peterson, who now faces life in prison.
Michael Iver Peterson, 59,
was born in 1943 and knew from a young age he wanted to be a writer. A
military brat who moved from place to place during his childhood,
Peterson read Hemingway and fantasized about being a hard-drinking,
hard-living writer one day, he told an interviewer in 1996.
Peterson attended Duke University in the early 1960s,
majoring in political science and editing the student newspaper. He
graduated from the Durham, N.C., school in 1965 with a bachelor's degree
in political science. He briefly studied law but never finished. A year
after graduating from Duke, Peterson took a civilian job at the U.S.
Department of Defense and was assigned to research arguments in favor of
increased military involvement in Vietnam. The experience propelled him
into action.
Peterson enlisted in the Marines and saw combat in
Southeast Asia. Although he is a decorated soldier, Peterson was forced
to admit during a failed bid for Durham mayor in 1999 that his Purple
Heart citation was the result of a car accident in Japan and not
fighting in Vietnam, as he had long claimed.
Peterson was married twice: first to Patricia Sue
Peterson, the mother of his sons Clayton and Todd. In 1997, he married
Nortel executive Kathleen Atwater, who has a daughter, Caitlin, from a
previous marriage.
A former newspaper columnist, Peterson is the author
of three novels that draw upon his military experience in years living
and traveling in the Far East, The Immortal Dragon, A Time
of War: A Bitter Peace, and Charlie Two Shoes and the Marines
of Love Company.
|
BBC does Peterson murder case |
| By John Stevenson : The Herald-Sun jstevenson@heraldsun.com Mar 9, 2005 : 8:02 pm ET DURHAM -- When ABC News last
summer aired a two-hour documentary about the Michael Peterson
murder case, District Attorney Jim Hardin Jr. thought it was too
heavily defense-oriented.
=====================================================================================================
Peterson lawyers: Friend's death, bisexuality
unfair as evidence
April 18, 2006
By MARGARET LILLARD, Associated Press Writer
The
prosecution of writer Michael Peterson was filled with
inflammatory, irrelevant evidence and judicial mistakes that
prevented him from getting a fair trial on charges of murdering
his wife, his lawyer told a state Court of Appeals panel
Tuesday.
The novelist, newspaper
columnist and one-time mayoral candidate was convicted 2 1/2
years ago of first-degree murder in the death of Nortel Networks
executive Kathleen Peterson.
Defense lawyer Thomas Maher
argued Tuesday before a three-judge appeals panel that Superior
Court Judge Orlando Hudson repeatedly erred in Peterson's trial
by allowing evidence that had no clear connection to the case,
and asked the panel to overturn his client's conviction.
"We think the issues in
this case -- none of them would be harmless by themselves,"
Maher said. "But clearly, to the extent that there are
multiple errors, it is much tougher for a court to say 'Well,
that didn't cause a problem.'"
In particular, Maher cited
testimony regarding Michael Peterson's bisexuality and evidence
comparing Kathleen Peterson's death to that in 1985 of Elizabeth
Ratliff, a friend of Peterson and his first wife, who like
Kathleen Peterson was found dead at the foot of a staircase.
Prosecutors implied that
Peterson was guilty of killing Ratliff, though he was never
accused of doing so, and that Kathleen Peterson was killed
during an argument after she found e-mail correspondence between
her husband and a male prostitute, though they presented no
proof she had seen the messages.
"What I saw was a
connecting problem with a number of the pieces of evidence,
which is the level of speculation you have to rely on to make it
relevant," Maher said. "That was true with Ratliff --
you had to speculate he was responsible for it. It was true with
their evidence about material on the computer -- you had to
speculate that (Kathleen Peterson) found it and speculate that
it led to a fight."
Peterson's team also
complained that the court allowed speculative testimony about
Kathleen Peterson's job security and finances as prosecutors
tried to show a motive, and that police used excessively vague
grounds to get the search warrants that allowed them to examine
computers found at the house.
There was no indication when
the appeals court would rule.
Kathleen Peterson was found
Dec. 9, 2001, in a pool of blood in the couple's house in
Durham. Peterson, 62, now serving a life sentence in prison,
insists that she died in an accidental fall.
State attorneys said the
defense opened the door for a discussion of Peterson's private
life by raising the issue in opening statements and insisting
that the Petersons' five-year marriage was a happy one.
Michael Peterson's
correspondence with a male prostitute a few months before his
wife's death indicated that picture was false, Assistant
Attorney General Jack Barnwell argued. State lawyers also argued
that the uncanny parallels between the deaths of the two women
were drawn through forensic evidence and could not be ignored.
"The evidence was not
just strong that (Kathleen Peterson's) death was homicide, it
was powerful," Assistant Attorney General William Crumpler
told the appeals panel.
He cited the testimony of Dr.
Deborah Radisch, an assistant state medical examiner who
performed autopsies on Kathleen Peterson and on Ratliff's
exhumed remains, concluding that both women had been beaten to
death.
But Maher said having the same
doctor examine both women created a "problem of
bootstrapping."
"You've got a weak case
on both of them, but the state's argument seems to be 'Well, it
couldn't happen twice.' And if you look at one it proves the
other and if you look at the other, it proves the first,"
he said. "It's kind of like this hall of mirrors where
everything gets expanded."
========================================
Peterson civil suit settled for $25M
February 1, 2007
By John Stevenson, The Herald-Sun
Lawyers have agreed to a $25
million settlement in a civil lawsuit that accused Michael
Peterson of killing his wife, according to documents reviewed
by The Herald-Sun, but the deal may be meaningless because the
once wealthy Durham novelist is serving a life prison sentence
and reportedly has little more than an $8 wristwatch to his
name.
Weather permitting, the settlement
will be officially announced today at the Raleigh law office
of Jay Trehy, who represented Peterson's stepdaughter in the
case.
The stepdaughter, Caitlin Atwater,
had accused Peterson of maliciously and fatally beating her
mother, Nortel Networks executive Kathleen Peterson, in
December 2001.
Kathleen Peterson was found dead
in a massive pool of blood in the Forest Hills mansion she
shared with her husband on Cedar Street.
Michael Peterson contended
Kathleen Peterson died from an accidental fall on a steep,
narrow, dimly lit stairway. But prosecutors convinced jurors
she was repeatedly beaten on the head with a blunt object,
perhaps a fireplace poker.
Peterson, a failed 1999 mayoral
candidate who is now 63, was sentenced to life in prison
without parole after jurors found him guilty of first-degree
murder in October 2003.
The conviction recently was upheld
by the state Court of Appeals, but the N.C. Supreme Court has
yet to review it.
Lawyer Trehy had no comment
Wednesday about the civil settlement.
However, he said earlier that a
civil judgment would be symbolically important even if
Peterson couldn't pay it.
Among other things, a judgment
would demonstrate that Kathleen Peterson's life had value and
that the community cared about her, according to Trehy.
Settlement documents reviewed by
The Herald-Sun on Wednesday confirm the $25 million amount,
while emphasizing that the agreement is "not to be
construed as an admission of liability, guilt or fault on the
part of Michael Peterson for the death of Kathleen
Peterson."
Underscoring that point, the
agreement further states that Michael Peterson denies any
liability, fault or guilt for his wife's death.
Kerry Sutton of Durham, one of
Peterson's attorneys, agreed with that assessment Wednesday.
She said Peterson "had
absolutely nothing to do with Kathleen's death. He thought her
life was precious and beyond priceless. He'd pay anything to
have her back."
|